CNET también está disponible en español. Don't show this again. But it's Android's rise that is perhaps the biggest story in the tablet market last quarter. For well over a year now, it has been believed that the iPad can fend off Android, due mainly to the general inability on the part of Apple's competitors to come up with a highly sought-after alternative. Back in the fourth quarter of 2010, the numbers seemed to prove that point, as Apple secured 68.2 percent of the tablet space, and Android devices came in second with just 29 percent share.
However, last year, Amazon launched the Kindle Fire, arguably the most successful Android tablet yet, And according to Strategy Analytics, that device, which costs just $199, was flanked by a host of other Android iphone case youtube ad tablets consumers are finally starting to find appealing, "Dozens of Android models distributed across multiple countries by numerous brands such as Amazon, Samsung, Asus and others have been driving volumes," Strategy analytics executive director Neil Mawston said today in a statement, "Android is so far proving relatively popular with tablet manufacturers despite nagging concerns about fragmentation of Android's operating system, user-interface and app store ecosystem."..
A new report from research firm Strategy Analytics finds Apple's iPad owns 58 percent of the tablet space, but Android devices now have 39 percent share. It wasn't long ago that Apple owned nearly 70 percent of the global tablet market. But now, the company is just barely holding on to half the space. During the fourth quarter of 2011, 10.5 million Android-based tablets shipped worldwide, helping them secure 39.1 percent of the market, according to new data from research firm Strategy Analytics. Apple's iPad, meanwhile, was able to hold on to the top spot, shipping 15.4 million units worldwide and capturing 57.6 percent of the tablet market. Interestingly, Microsoft nabbed the third spot with 1.5 percent share, thanks to Windows running on 400,000 tablets shipped last quarter.
CNET también está disponible en español, Don't show this again, Furthermore, the telecom companies get to wrap themselves in the hip vibe that Apple brings to its products and partners, and can you put a price on being cool?, Apparently, you can, and it's a steep one, The dilemma for the carriers is that with each successful quarter of iPhone sales, there is a corresponding hit to their profit as a result of the extra subsidies paid out, as illustrated by Verizon and AT&T's iphone case youtube ad fourth-quarter results, (Sprint Nextel hasn't reported yet, but will likely see a similar impact.)..
While the carriers have argued that the short-term hit will lead to longer-term gains, the desire for constant upgrades--and the subsidies that go with it--blunt any benefit they get in the long term. Customers who own iPhones aren't just content with their current model; they will re-up as soon as possible. There lies the problem: a never-ending loop of subsidy payments that the carriers can't get out of, largely because the iPhone has become so key to their growth. "At this point, the iPhone is like a drug, and the carriers are hooked," said Craig Moffett, an analyst at research firm Sanford C. Bernstein. "The question isn't whether it's worth it. It's whether they can get by without it. ".